Kuwait: Candidates react to Salafist 'fatwa'

Kuwait Times
KUWAIT: Reacting to the fatwa issued by Islamic Salafists Movement asking voters to abstain from voting for female candidates, Dr Fatima Al-Abdaly, a first constituency candidate described it is a 'dangerous indicator.' "This is a clear violation of the Constitution and electoral law," she asserted, adding that it reflects the fact that women now stand at the Parliament's threshold. This knowledge has prompted these individuals to take steps to discourage their foray into politics." She said that other Muslim countries do view women's electoral franchise as a problem, "The statement takes us back to the era before women gained their political rights." She questioned why the fatwa was not declared during the 2006 and 2008 elections.

She said that they (Salafists) are trying to target women during the elections, since many voters had planned to vote for women. But this(edict ) may hurt women's interests since voting for them is being condemned as a sin. Third constituency candidate Ayesha Al-Rushaid said that since the Salafists movement has exposed its real nature to the Kuwaiti people, they are now playing the religious card. Islam does not forbid political participation which is evidenced by the 'Baiah' system in Islam where men and women are considered equal.

Another third constituency candidate Naeema Al-Hai said that such fatwas now aim at preventing women from reaching the Parliament and reduce their chances. This indicates how weak those political factions are at the possibility of women wining seats in the Parliament. She said that women's participation in Parliament does not mean 'general jurisdiction,' rather it is participation decision-making and there are examples of women holding leadership positions in Muslim countries. Meanwhile a official said that the government will not comment on inflammatory statements. He said that the appearance of such issues now aim at gaining certain groups' votes. Kuwait's Constitution has guaranteed equality to both man and woman.

Dr Faris Al Wuqayan, a researcher at the Center for Strategic Studies criticized the Salafists Movement's statement, adding that it does not relate to the 'civil state' and democracy at all, and questioned, "Is it okay to benefit from the woman's vote as a voter without granting her our vote as a candidate"? He said such statements take us back to the Middle Ages of Europe because it is not related to the modern era at all, in fact 'the brains that came up with it need treatment.' When asked about the possibility of the so-called edict gaining support among masses, Al-Wquayan said that the voting standards are not determined by religious practices. This is because clergy men's illegal practices and participation in the country's administration, economy, financial companies' administration are well known.

This gives out the idea that ideological religious affiliations are not related to ethical practices, even it stems from a liberal or tribal person. Columnist and political analyst Sami Al-Nisf found it strange for a few to convene and call themselves a movement and then start issuing statements. He said that the Salafists movement that is represented in Kuwait, is the revival of society and that they did not hear such statements from them. Al-Nisf said that Islam is not limited to Kuwait, but it is practiced in 56 countries around the world. He added that many gave women the right to run for office and vote and women are allowed to hold the office of prime minister there.